India's 1% Club proved a generation will pay to be taught money by people who aren't banks. Nobody has built it for Canada. I've built the product half — I'm looking for the CMO and CTO who build the other half with me.
Canadian banks post record profits.
It was partly your money.
KOHO, Neo, EQ, Wealthsimple — all monetize deposits, interchange or AUM. None of them can build a product whose economics improve when you pay institutions less. That's structural, not competitive.
Whoever owns the consumer trust layer before the rails open gets the distribution when they do. That window is measured in months.
They have no tool that says it out loud, in their language, with their own numbers. Education, community and a product — not another dashboard with charts.
Neobanks are teams. We score them all — including the ones we recommend. In Canada, that's a category of one.
I left my job and shipped the hard part first. Every claim below is tested, not planned.
What doesn't exist yet:
users.
Statement scan, leaks, all seven calculators. No signup wall, no bank login. Nobody believes "your bank takes $400/yr" until they see their number.
$4.99/mo. Month-over-month intelligence, new-charge alerts, priority features. Cheap enough that closing one leak pays for a year.
The Rate Fight. Regional pool counters, collective negotiation. Members recruit members because the promise requires scale.
Canadian-specific and unglamorous: TFSA/RRSP/FHSA, IRD penalties, HISA rates, credit. Acquisition and retention in one motion.
Referral splits with the $0-fee institutions our scan already recommends. Deterministic ranking, never pay-to-play — and we say so in-product.
You believe distribution is a product, not a budget line. You've built an audience or a movement — Canadian personal finance, fintech, or creator-led growth.
Why it's real: the product already manufactures shareable moments — every user's leak number renders to a branded card in one tap. You amplify a number, not hype.
You care that the privacy claim is architectural, not a policy page. You'd own the engine, the rails, and the learning loop.
Why it's real: the hard part is already proven solvable — penny accuracy on real statements. You're scaling a working engine, not gambling that one can exist.
If that filters you out, the filter worked. If it reads as "solvable, and early is the only time it's cheap" — let's talk.
One email. No deck required — the product is live and it argues better than I do.
makingcentsai@gmail.com